home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: PPC compilers
- Date: 15 Jan 1996 13:16:42 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <4ddgja$7kj@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <john.hendrikx.40ka@grafix.xs4all.nl> <4b77tq$htp@serpens.rhein.de> <5BoUx*MZe@yaps.rhein.de> <4cpi23$ong@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4cq342$j2l@serpens.rhein.de> <4csvb6$oa6@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4cu1pq$1om@serpens.rhein.de> <DKyzGr.1G0@hermes.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> <4d1f9e$ctb@serpens.rhein.de> <jdjg2dmqowe.fsf@hyppynaru.cs.hut.fi>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- Osma.Ahvenlampi@hut.fi (Osma Ahvenlampi) writes:
-
- >In article <4d1f9e$ctb@serpens.rhein.de> mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
- >>isthesin@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de (Stephan Thesing) writes:
- >>>'if p then c' is only false, if p==true and c==false, but
- >>>trivially true, if p==false, as anybody see by looking
- >>>at the truth table of the implication relation ;-)
- >>I would ask you to improve your logic.
-
- >Um, he's right, Michael.
-
- Oh, yes, he is right with this statement. But it has nothing
- to do with my sentence which wasn't an implication at all.
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-